<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carl Sagan on Astrology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drvasu.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/carl-sagan-on-the-psuedo-science-of-astrology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drvasu.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/carl-sagan-on-the-psuedo-science-of-astrology/</link>
	<description>This site will publish literary, spiritual, scoiological and political reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 11:33:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://drvasu.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/carl-sagan-on-the-psuedo-science-of-astrology/#comment-918</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drvasu.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/carl-sagan-on-the-psuedo-science-of-astrology/#comment-918</guid>
		<description>Interesting article, i see astrology as a philosphy and not a pseudoscience from which scientific knowledge emerged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article, i see astrology as a philosphy and not a pseudoscience from which scientific knowledge emerged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramón Morales Castel</title>
		<link>http://drvasu.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/carl-sagan-on-the-psuedo-science-of-astrology/#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramón Morales Castel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drvasu.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/carl-sagan-on-the-psuedo-science-of-astrology/#comment-866</guid>
		<description>Carl Sagan made a big mistake. He inverts the actual sequence of historic events and says that astronomy existed first as a pure science, which is not true. It would be more correct to say that astronomy existed in ancient astrology as a pre-science system. I would write the whole thing like this: &quot;As precision of measurement improved, records had to be kept, so ASTROLOGY encouraged observation and mathematics and the development of writing...&quot; Then, many centuries later, parts of astrology´s empiric components evolved into what is now called astronomy. Yes, astrology is astronomy´s mother. So, here we got one prejudice of a &quot;science man&quot; against astrology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl Sagan made a big mistake. He inverts the actual sequence of historic events and says that astronomy existed first as a pure science, which is not true. It would be more correct to say that astronomy existed in ancient astrology as a pre-science system. I would write the whole thing like this: &#8220;As precision of measurement improved, records had to be kept, so ASTROLOGY encouraged observation and mathematics and the development of writing&#8230;&#8221; Then, many centuries later, parts of astrology´s empiric components evolved into what is now called astronomy. Yes, astrology is astronomy´s mother. So, here we got one prejudice of a &#8220;science man&#8221; against astrology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
